Germany'S MINISTRY FOR CHEATURES AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 964, sig. 110-8/37 (damaged)

Page 49

English Translation

thE draws, although it is written in the head page "The President of the Land in Moravia". It is a very peculiar state that an institution which does not belong to the authority has a subscription authority within the framework of this authority, which can only be granted to the head of the authority. It remains only to be surprised how it can be at all possible to plunge such a distinguished administrative apparatus and a police organization made of one piece into problems that would not have to be any problems. Thus not enough, the non-uniformed protectorate police has built up their own criminal agency apparatus and this again at the expense of the police unit, since the so far criminal departments of the Police Directorates have been removed from it and turned into criminal directories whose position towards the police director led to these known miserly ambiguities, the de facto state is at any rate today the fact that the police chief in command of his uniformed police guard corps against. To the criminal police the answer can be obtained that he had to give no orders and instructions at all, because one only had to accept such orders from the inspector of the uniformed, i.e. non-uniformed protectorate police. This is not only pure theory, but rather from the experiences that a police director has actually made. We must not overlook the fact that any administrative act, so that, as has been clearly stated above, even in the pure police sector, requires an order and execution. The order can be a general rule of law or a special order. Therefore, it must be issued by a legally qualified person in any case. The implementation is an act in which any resistance must be expected, the removal of which may have to be carried out by means of brutal force. It is clear that there is a need for a different training. Therefore, for each police act, the use of the administrative officer on the one hand and the police officer against the police man on the other is to be expected. This in itself clear divorce, which has proven itself excellent in the former Austrian countries, has become a waste of time by the last reorganizations and has led to as many ambiguities as they were until then completely unknown. In turn, I am allowed to meet a district chief here, who asked about a fact in his district, expressed himself that it is so difficult today to know what was going on in the district. This is truly an irony of fate, that the man in whom the restricted sovereignty of the district is to concentrate is now no longer able to be what he has been in the simple and clearly structured old administration, in front of loud competences and responsibilities that individual divisions attach to their striving for independence, which serves more personal than objective purposes. I would also remind you of the case of the five motor vehicles arriving at a crime scene, since it is not yet certain whether and to what extent the secret state police, the Germans