STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2286, sig. 109-11/88

Page 3

English Translation

2 2 - completed. In neither of the two sales cases, an approval of the Land Office was required, was not applied for and therefore not granted, as both purchase contracts were concluded at all without the addition and knowledge of the ground office. Krajič of 16.3.1940 happened, according to the then applicable regulations, with the consent of the competent district authority or the Oberlandrat. III. A housing law for Šimandl existed and does not exist and was not agreed in the present sales contract. Therefore, there is no mention of non-compliance with obligations of the Krajíč over the Šimandl in this context. IV. With the order of the head of the land ante of 2l.3.1942, the farm of Johann Krajič was established for the sake of strict management in accordance with Reg.Vdg. 87/39 in compulsory administration and thus the responsibility of the Land Office as supervisory authority over the compulsory administrator. The compulsory administration was duly noted in the land register. Since at that time no longer Šimandl, but Krajič was the owner of the farm, the imposition of the compulsory administration on the legal or material situation of Simandl as the legal agent of Krajíč had no influence at all. V. It is not correct - this follows from the prediction of itself - that in the case of Šimandl Krajíč turned to the ground office - district station Pilsen. With the file number mentioned in the shout of the Minister of the Reich Seyss-Inguart 5269/42 KL 65/Dr. it has the following relation: Because of an execution case of the Šimandl_against Krajič, which is ongoing at the District Court in Pilsen as an execution court, the aforementioned court, having regard to the coercive administration now decreed by the Office, asked the District Office of the Pilsen Land Office whether a possible sell-off of the forcibly administered company could be expected in the foreseeable future. The court's request was based on the number of transactions in question.