English Translation

- 9 - I declare: a) I did not get to see the guarantee order of the Bratislava estate court from l924 in the sense of their entry about the German Federal Foreign Office from January 1928, b) I only now know that for 4 1/2 years it did not arrive at the land registry office Revuca. c) I only now know that after 4 1/2 years, when the Czech state was already registered as a landowner in the land register, it came there, but had to be rejected by the judge, because the state was in the ground register as a property. I believe that it was an official duty of the court of succession to immediately send the order to the court in Revuca by way of notice. In spite of the remark in the land registers that the Czech State intended to overstep the territories by way of confiscation, the land magistrate in Revuca dicse should have undoubtedly carried the Duchess's security and also angctragon. Then the Duchess would certainly also have appeared to the Land Office as an actively legitimate person at the takeover proceedings and should have belonged to all matters of ours. To this right the Duuchin has undoubtedly come about, when things have played out as they are held up to us. I do not know which state is responsible for this delay, which resulted in the destruction of the right of Duchess. On the question that this inhibition of the sending of this order can only be possible, either the judge himself will stop the resonation of the order, or a secretary or the postman or a Boamter of the receiving office will be patient and won for it, while still remaining abundantly wonderful, Why the complicity 4 1/2 years later after registration of the state suddenly comes into motion, I declare: to me the matter seems abundantly mystical. Apparently, there has ever been an interest in the Duchess not being right.