Korrespondenz in den EhrenangelegenheitenCzernin- Polzer-Hoditz undCzernin- Sternberg Page 6 · 6 of 23
Correspondence in the matters of honourCzernin-Polzer-Hoditz and Czernine- Sternberg
English Translation
Mr Ristow, in this article there is, however, a time limit - free wheel; with good reason; for it would have been quite umological and gamz determination contained, it would be absurd for the election of the new representatives if such a time would be included in it; one can indeed grant a 24 hour time, but the opposite side has apparently overlooked, Comtumaz time limit with its possible adverse consequences - that the whole of Chapter XII Ristpw, to which also Article 84 belongs, does not impose a party which, by its will, has at least a delay - exclusively in the eyes of the Vachsel of the representatives, who does not want to bring about the change of representatives, which only by virtue of the right, the client, its agents varabechie - the initiative of the opposing party to do so. In this case, it is necessary for the client to make use of his or her rights and, in the exercise of his/her rights, to give his/ her representative a reasonable period of time, and, if he/she is obliged to exercise his/she's rights, then he/ she must be able to make a reasonable choice within 24 hours, and For this reason, half of which he must make his new fraudsters known, only in the well-evidently Article 80 does not contain a deadline. This case, if the mandaat, in the exercise of his right, has overshadowed all his divinations; it has taken its leave with the representative of Abfas and within 24 hours has made its new transfer of the unilateral protocol to Articles 84 and 85 of the Code, i.e. in fact itself based on the delay 2yne Ristow, which both articles, as has been proved, bear the blame, Article 85 gives no reference to the opposite side, this case at all. The opposite side has drawn the most extensive consequences from its refusal of the knightly execution* quite false premises; it has to declare because of defaults of a deadline, which has never existed at all correctly, but unilaterally declared the trade of honour for its client Nie and ninmer in the present case 1 for knightly order. This is not one of the representatives' represen tatives, which, in consequence, the person made states that this declaration by the party, as a result of the right of the party to be completely unjustifiable and to be able to withdraw its representatives from the counterparty, has entered into force, Count OzERiIt had never taken place. dea Ehrencodex Ristow. The intention of his former representatives, Prince STARHEuBERG and Princes Furthermore, those who have been made to say goodbye to the representational CROY from some grudge and, in their place, to elect honorary representatives for Sr. Ereellenz Count Ottokar GZERil. Here it is a change for knightly done. The value saver, who had only to make the wish of his own candidate Jrobadufm for the reason that the G e g e n B e i - La had raised against the Vartreter Einaprache. Heyeu This case belongs in a completely different main piece of the Codex Ristow; it belongs in dam XI. In this article, as it stands by itself, there is a provision of any time limit for the election of new representatives 317.