Korrespondenz in den EhrenangelegenheitenCzernin- Polzer-Hoditz undCzernin- Sternberg Page 5 · 5 of 23
Correspondence in the matters of honourCzernin-Polzer-Hoditz and Czernine- Sternberg
English Translation
XV PROTOKOLL received unilaterally by the representatives of Sr, Excelleaz of Count Ottokar O Z E R N I N in his eminence with Sr. Excel - lenz Count Arthur POLZER- HODITZ. Vienna, on 1 March 1924. in place of the reprehensible repre sentatives of Count GZERvIl, the Pürsten STARHEMBERG and Prince, Leopold CroY, of which the Gagen side was informed on the same day by means of a recoumanded letter. It was only after the agreement had been drawn up that the one-sided protocol (Iv) was sent to Count CZERrIN to the opposing party, in which the trade of honour for the Count POLZEt was declared unilaterally executed, since the time limit set by the opponent in accordance with Article 84 R i = t o w on 28. II. 1924 at 6 p.m. On the other hand, the undersigned representatives, who were entitled to declare the trade in honour to be done by drawing up a one-sided protocol, declare that they had no right to do so in a third-party manner. Nor was the same entitled to state in accordance with Article 85 of the Ristow that the knightly performance of the Gra - fen GZERfIN was greatly prevented. Both decisions were based on a completely false application of the provisions of the Honorary Codex Ristov. The Gognerian unilateral protocol, which unilaterally declares the trade in honours to be settled, is based on Article 84 918.