English Translation

11X TAATS PROTOCOL one-sidedly mated by the representatives of Sr, Excellency of Count Ottokar C Z E R N I N in his matter of honour with Sr. Exeel - lemz Count Arthur POLZER - HODITZ. Vienna, 1, March 1924. In the same day, the opposite side was informed by means of a recommanded letter to the prince, Leopold CROY, who was the most powerful of the former dukes of Count CZERvIn, Prince STARHEBERG. It was only in the absence of this understanding - bams that the count CZEmlIN was given the unilateral protocol ( Iv ) to the opposite side, in which the trade of honour for the count. POLZEN declared to be unilaterally done murde, since the time limit set by the opponent in the Sinme of Articlea 84 R i = t o w on 28.11.1924 at 6 p.m. had expired, that the same had been agreed by the Nominiermg meuer represen tative, to which the signed representatives declare that the opposite party was not entitled to declare the trade of honour to be arbitrarily settled by drawing up a unilateral protocol. Nor was it entitled to make Article 85 Ristow to state that the tripartite performance by the side of the Gra - fen CZERrIN was substantially hindered. Both decisions are based on a completely false. Anwondumg of the provisions of the Ehrencodex Ristov. The opposing unilateral protocol, which unilaterally declares the sale of honour, is based on Article 84 318.