STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2350, sig. 109-11/152 Page 41 · 41 of 51
A SOCIETY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2350, sig. 109-11/152
English Translation
38 - 3 - direction of Budweis, when his director appointed by Nečasek in November 1942 vurde. Nečasek asked the Vanes in April 1942 for a kna- benfahrrad. Since Vanes drew him attention to the fund office, he went to Teršip, visited the find room and explained from one of the wheels placed there that he would buy it. Neğasek then contacted Vaneš, handed him 100,- Kr as a finder's fee for further delivery to the finder and had the bicycle picked up by an official. The find notice was given to Vanež of Teršip' and confirmed the takeover as owner with a false name. Then he returned the find to the Teršip, who had a precise knowledge of all the connections, but dared not take action against his superiors, Nečasek was clear that Vanes could only take possession of the wheel by an incorrect registration, he recognized and approved the action of the Vanes in all its consequences. His sense of guilt also becomes apparent from the fact that he was spoken of as a revision of the fund office, which Rad vieder tried to sneak back. In addition, Vaneš is obliged, in four other cases, to have taken 1 leather bag, 1 bicycle rubber cover, 1 golden fountain pen and a rear wheel nines bicycle (the latter in exchange for an inferior bike) unauthorizedly from the fund office and to have acknowledged in the finds as owner nit false names. Teršip handed over these things to him, although he wished that he would make himself punishable. Anguished Nečasek managed the Confidential funds, He is transferred by the witness testimony of the witness Konopova, who, although she was not working as a confident, handed over from this fund 200th- Kr. Nečasek noticed that if she were better off economically, the witness could pay back the money. Against the witness Konopova ran a lawsuit for theft, The Konopua, who was convicted of theft went after her interrogation at the police department of Budweis to Nečasek and asked him to settle the matter. Nečasek then instructed a Chief Commissioner under his authority to allow the investigators to carry out the operations of extracting the owner's stolen furs.