STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2048, sig. 109-7/55 Page 55 · 55 of 92
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2048, sig. 109-7/55
English Translation
48 5 could, but it is the front of destruction organized by Judaism of sub-humanism, above all against the renewed peoples of Europe. These have now, under the leadership of Germany united in National Socialism, set out for the European campaign against Bol-shewism. Only with the power of the renewed Europe alone will the final victory be won. 3. Too few children. The decline in birth and its consequences for Deutsahland's future. Our struggle for the future of the Great German Empire only makes sense if a large and healthy people grows in it, lives and works. What is the use of the maturing victory if one day - like the collapsed France - we can no longer sustain and protect our empire? A large house without children is of no use to us. We had in Germany (Old Kingdom) in 1840 I 1,300,000 births 26 11 1901 = 2,032,000 11 11 " 1931 = 1,032,000 11 " 11 1932 = 978,000 11 11 '1 1933 = 957,000 11 It 11 1937 = 1,209,000 11 (with the 0stmark 1.286,000 The population (in the Old Kingdom) grew since 1840 around the Dopple, since 1900 alone by 10 million! In the last 100 years, the population has doubled. Nevertheless, the number of births from 1901 to 1933 constantly decreased! How is that possible? In 1910, for example, 6.4 million young families capable of reproduction had 1.8 million children. In 1939, 8.6 million of such families had only 865,000 children! It is clear: the German family has too few children. If we want to preserve the population, every German family must have an average of 4 children. In 1932 there were only 2, today there are not 3 children. On 1.O00 inhabitants were born in Germany : In the year 1875 = 40 children 1935 🙂 18.9 children 34 11 1890 = 36 1 1936 = 19.0 " 11 11 1910 = 30 1 1937 = 18.8 1 1 "1 1933 = 15 " 1938 = 19.7 11 So we see 1935-1938 again an increase. But this progress must not be overestimated: we have not yet reached the number of births necessary to maintain our population; the deceptive surplus; how is it that, despite the decline in births, the population as a whole has grown? Answer: the mortality has sunk : 1890 died on 1000 inhabitants 25 people 1910 " " 1 1000 44 16 " 1933 " " 1000 H 11 " 1 - 9 -