STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2291, sig. 109-11/93 Page 18 · 18 of 21
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2291, sig. 109-11/1/93
English Translation
Eupmnel - eg orüdletes adoetueed Blsa' gen t Okoper Javs SSNT! D'S TO'SROS affected party is subject to which public interests in the specific case are to be regarded as more important and therefore deserve priority. The objection that the failure of the requested communication to the tenants constitutes a formal lack of procedure is also not valid. Even .9.v.ifatawas_by the way not true, the appointment to the tenants originally meant a formal lacked would have been remedied by the fact that the tenants were relegated by the time-limited appeals the post-eisrahnweie of the timely notification of the communication bn ng mdö LO - It was therefore to be decided as above. .tlfetesg .ds tebnizgednw ale doi alew neb zit regrstregive briw gatt tbetetquaH reDereLandesvizepräsident: 'Ko S ' signature (unreadable). - (..) bieronad neath mdt bn naffetesd vs natdotli bn tdoef rente grmden suenaperten :gaubnige tdgnt tted bwad d gnulfetadoia mu noin mdandouqenenl rab tad nola aa ab sbtadod ab w l i i ebde tdng o td atewelelgatad ante mill steaed m da nagsfn marairättlim narbne gitdoiw "gngibierevatsata" sib rüt nonfesnte mt aeW evitaxat enied bnke gngibiatrevatsste rab natiedgibnewdol sib rsdü netdoiank nI tneveferri doaiteinnt m do gw i t dd reb gufetvd a sadbn and sted h tetd k