English Translation

9a - 2 - ,) Sheet 3. Rightly it must be called "1437 extinction of the Luxembourgians". in section "15th century" bad formulation "Removal of the Bohemian-Moravian region from the Reichge- thank". Some lines later in my opinion undesirable the formulation "the Czech people"; it would be better not to emphasize for this time the existence of the Czechs as a people. In the middle of the page is also the border print "1471 double wedding". At the end of the side it could be noted that Bohemia loses its state-law special position in the empire. 4.) Sheet 4. Druckfehlung "Dahinsichen". The mention of the emperors Josef I and Karl VI is completely meaningless. A few lines further is an unfortunate sentence about the "Bohemian Baroque". The description of the Silesian wars should be set out spatially and deepened in terms of content. There is no justification for why different battles are taking place in Bohemia and Moravia. Emperor Joseph II is presented in an unfavorable way; one must nevertheless bear in mind that the reforms revoked by his successors e.g. The introduction of the German official language was also included. There is absolutely no indication at all that at present Joseph II has reached the lowest level of Czechism so far and seemed to be at least 77fgren as a people. 5. If the above is carried out, the presentation of the Czech Volkische Wiederwaken would have much more effect on page 5. For the rest, the most important Czech names, which are often unknown to the old Reichsdeutscher official, include Palacky, the manuscript forger Hanka, the Austrian Minister Badeni, the influence of Herder and Jahn, and so on, in a manual by the Reichsprotector. It would also be useful to mention the founding year of the Czech University (18s2).