English Translation

4() Example of social attitudes against families with toddlers at the Bergdirektion in Karwin-Berghütte . In the early years of 1943, the Hoheneggerstr 432 house was allocated to four families by an unnecessary struggle for housing, which used to serve office purposes at the shaft.A garden was rejected by the Bergdirektion Karwin, who, together with 5 (now 6) children, are about 1oo m2 of free garden space and are used as a garden by two employees without children. These four families have no garden at their disposal, so these children have to play on a piece of land on which slag is deposited, and in addition, only the smoked factory road is available as a runout.Mr. Chief Inspector Cobiet, who lives in the neighborhood, was willing to step one off from his two gardens.Mr Bergdir.Kramen refused this in a meeting.ls Mr. Kramer (used since Oct.1942 at the mountain hut) is supposed to reflect on Mr. Cobiet's living quarters and therefore not want to let the garden swim.The other neighbour, Mr. Insp.Becke, who has no toddlers, is working on an exceptionally large garden, which employs several workers.He did not see himself forced for the five children in the hut. House 432 Gartenland. This was done by the spokesman for the toddlers in agreement with the families involved in the upper mountain hut instance (Dr.Schicketanz) on 3 May 1943.On 4 May, Mr. Schmelzer, who presented this, was asked by Mr. Dir.Kramer for an account, because he would not have rejected the garden.(By contrast, all the witnesses in the meeting where he made the decision!) He should have refused (without having asked Mr Cobiet himself before, which is assigned to the garden!) because a way should have been made for the children and for this one would not have had the labour force and also not the wooden slats, which are on references.Mr. Schmelzer then replied that he himself, with the other three fathers of the children, was the labor force for the small way. In this dispute, Mr. Kramer ended.Kramer understood that Mr. Cobiet's second garden was at the disposal of the children.Mr. Kraner had been informed by telephone of Mr. v. Bardeleben shortly before about his social opinion by the Minutes.Aerr Dr.Schicketanz May 3, 1943. Mr. Kramer replied, and later on, in many disputes concerning the open air for the children, that he would not have reflected on the apartment and thus on the second garden of Mr. Cobiet. However, there are several witnesses against this, even though Mr. Kromer was never able to say anything about his intention. The second garden, however, was already under construction and now the other neighbor should leave his garden a bit voluntarily-for the children.This was impossible.(These are party members!) The next morning Mr. Schmelzer called Mr. Dir Kramer and said that the matter of an urgent solution is pending, that the spring time is over, that there should also be something green grown for the children In this case, he would not speak to the director, but as a National Socialist, and if he had not been decided by the next day, he will again inform Dr Schicketanz and inform other dances about it.Mr Schmelzer, without regard to his position against his superior, has represented the social situation and health of the small descendants. Kramer said that the next day he would come with another director (Kaalberg).Mr. Schmelzer also invited the competent High Authority (Pg.Kozdon-Karwin-Süd) and his company chairman, also responsible for zero, as a witness to the Lord's petition.