THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 258, sig. 110-4/104

Page 14

English Translation

3-8 3 and he himself had not expressed any concerns against this contract in a long conversation with him, even a few days ago. This statement was confirmed by K. 2. In his letter, K. against the introduction of HGW Stahl-GmbH, which had taken over the sale of the products and the purchase of raw materials for the entire group with the 1.5.1944. It was noted that the proposal to establish an organisation for the sale for the whole group of products by K. K. also had to deal with the purchase of raw materials. To the precise question of Pigiger's whether the ( :W for 2 years bought all raw materials for Witkowitz and the needs of Wit-kowitz were always fully satisfied in this field, K. could only do so with yes. The question of Pleiger's whether or not he had any difficulties arising from this purchase question was answered by K. Verneint. Ku-chinka argued against the introduction of the entire supply and purchase by HGw-Stahl that the introduction had taken place too quickly. Furthermore, K. had complained in his letter that he had not received the service of the HGW Stahl-GmbH. office for Witkowitz. In response to his own suggestion that the commercial management of the subsidiaries concerned should form this office, he admitted that he had made this proposal. K. Nor was K. able to answer the question in which the HGW's personnel and material abstentions were at the expense of the Witkowitzer union, even though he himself had made this claim. - 4 - The Commission's proposal for a directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances and preparations for use in foodstuffs