NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 258, sig. 110-4/104 Page 15 · 15 of 54
THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 258, sig. 110-4/104
English Translation
1-5 4 of K. could not be answered. Likewise, he could not answer the further precise question Pleigers to call him a case of such a campaign. In his letter to the Enemy Commissioner, K. complained about the direct involvement of board member Dr. In response to the question of Dr. Schmidt, where and when he had come too close to the K.'s expertise or what events a Recnt gave him to make such a false statement, K. said that he had heard that Dr. Smith had drawn up an organizational plan for the Witkowitz union. Schmidt explained that he had neither drawn up such a plan nor even known it at all, who asked him who had made this communication to him. K. could not give an answer to this Prague. In the letter K. had claimed that without his knowledge a tank cabinet of the continental trading company had been broken up by the HGW. It was noted here that the managing director dismissed by K. sicn had refused to open this fanzer cabinet to K.'s representative and had been opened in agreement with the managing manager of this cabinet by HGW (avision). ( explained that he had been in the sanatorium at that time and did not know the details. In his letter that the Witkowitzer union had so far produced all its achievements with its own personnel and material forces, that the HGW had not contributed in any way positively to this, Pleiger noted that this claim was not only tendentious, but almost lied that K. had to be ashamed to make such lost claims. On the basis of a large number of reports, Pleiger explained the advantages of the Witkowitz union from the HGw. Each of these examples was confirmed by K. In the discussions held under the chairmanship of Minister Prank, the allegation was made, Dr. Schmidt had placed a sign with the name General Director on his office, thereby giving rise to rumours that the K. had been dismantled. Dr. Schmidt explained to this effect that he had only seen this sign a few days ago and did not know who had made this sign. K. explained that he himself asked an employee what name one would approach the door - 5 •