STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 933, sig. 109-4/686 Page 26 · 26 of 19
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 933, sig. 109-4/686
English Translation
L4a He literally used the term "monitoring". Dr. B l a s c h e k also knows that I am informed that Fr. W o j t è c h and Fr. K n a P, who before me worked with Vice-President S c h u b e r t, also had the mandate to monitor S c u b er t and have done so. I have done this by Dr. B l a s c h e k to obtain an express order from all the official and personal letters of the Vice-President S c h u b e r t, which may interest him, to produce a discrepancy and to hand it over to him. It is incorrect if Dr. B l a s c h e k claims that I only had the order to arrange for Dr. B l b e k to be presented in advance, according to the agreement between S c h u b e r t and Dr.B l a c h h e K. I was aware that this agreement existed, but the registrator was always aware of this. Dåe's monitoring order, which Dr. B l a s c h e k, the letter which Dr. B l b l a c h h ek was not available on the basis of this agreement. Dr. F u c h s often complains about him as a ministerial director that he knows his personal act, which is already very swollen with these complaints.I remember this. Talk exactly on the occasion of a complaint by Vice President S c h u b e r t about Dr. B l a s c h e k because of the allegedly self-sufficient attitude of Dr. After many difficulties, my salary has finally been so fixed that I was classified retroactively in Group VIb. However, I have not been paid any more since the time-limitless dismissal, i.e. since 31 January 1942. I am entitled to this under all circumstances, especially since I have also become ill before being released without notice and had to be paid for up to a year's salary under my contract during the illness. I have never claimed that Dr. B l a s c h e k made the subsequent payment dependent on the signing of the contract and I want Dr. B l a s c h e k also do not accuse extortion. 1593