THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 884, sig. 110-7/46

Page 21

English Translation

wot transcript hV. Prag,den 2.12.1943. tbm 68 Report about the child Peter Preidel. U4SAOA 306 On 20.8.43 the child of Peter Dreidel was taken by the parents to the observation station. Since a very strict ban for mO all photos had been passed, I rejected the recording with the Be- SU reason that the clinic was in the move. The parents called on a telephone call from the Ear Clinic with our clinic's official doctor, who was supposed to have promised this admission. Mrs. Ober- 1a Physician Dr. Leiechner was asked, who also rejected the admission of the 08 admission ban. We consulted with the parents and took the child with the explicit indication that we wanted to spare them the long way home with the newly operated child. The child had had Rieber but as the metws parents expressly emphasized until then only good chairs had. In the ear clinic he had received some milk in the evening and the attending physician wanted clinical observation because after the anaesthesia he feared a dyspepsia in sider mastoiditis.It was already repeated during the admission that the child could only stay in the clinic for a few days for the observation of the chairs, that it had to be transferred to the ear hospital at a glance during the move. During the recording examination it emptied a thin esEStuhl,theshelb was precautionly made a intestinal purification and fed with carrot soup for 1 day after tea peuse. Schoh on the 21st good carrot chair. On Euvernil the following day defeveration. The off st chairs remained impeccable even when the food was carefully never built up under the supervision of the upper physician. In one of the frequent visits of the parents, he was rushed along to the next day to move the inventory to the new clinic lewem, so that the point at which the child had to be moved back to if.xg the ear clinic was brought closer, since as was described to the parents at the beginning, then neither nursing staff nor laundry could be adequately secured. The parents instigated me to refrain from returning to the Ghrenklinik. We advised that the parents rejected all other suggestions on my part and suggested whether the child could not be cared for at home with precise instructions from our mother. As a result, we left to the Ear Clinic the decision whether the ear disease would result in an outpatient treatment and decided that the Earsklinik approved ambulatory treatment by a specialist to the urge of the parents.