STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 128, sig. 109-2/29 Page 9 · 9 of 87
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 128, sig. 109-2/29
English Translation
12 5a 2 - tectorate in the police station in Section V. The police are in a special position and this is also a special treatment according to the law. In his proposal one could then rely on the creation of the in the circular of the l9. Apri. In 1942 - LG 8400 - 222 I A - Chapter 1 P for the agendas of the officials seconded to the Protectorate waived, especially since the creation of this cspite in the particularly held cases was subject to considerable visual acuity in the police sector. Minßat Dr. Delbrück (RFm) explained the circular of 19 December 1942. ==References====External links==* Official website* Official website the allocation of all the posts of officials assigned to the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia in a chapter 1 P and the maintenance of a uniform form of implementation of these posts was often distributed in various chapters in the sections of the Reich budget so far. MinRat Rheins (Reichsführer-iy, Orpo) welcomed the proposal of the MinRait Kallenbsch (nrM). In his view, substantial simplifications would be achieved and all the difficulties would be removed if a clear line were to be kept in line with the general government, and he also considered it right that all personal and material expenditure - the general expenditure on the budget - should be included in the protectorate after the previous increase in the budget of the police. BdO and Bds in the police's budget. This had already been the opinion of the police. The deployment of the two posts for the commander of the order police and the commanders of the security police, as well as for the heads of the Office of Law and Administration at the BdOS and BDS in the budget of the Reichsprotector did not correspond to the wishes of the Police. This view was confirmed by MinRat Dr.Siegert (Reichsf.-, Sipo). In addition MinRaat Kallenbach (RFM) kiar states that the previous regulation was not met by the RFM, so suf repeatedly submitted the wish of the Reichsprotector Frhr. v. Neurath. RegR. Arndts (Reichsprot., Budget Group) did not think of the proposal of the Minsat Kallenbach (RFM) as a matter of principle, but he pointed out that the question of the implementation of the posts of the BdO and BdS would not be decided in the context of this discussion because of their fundamental and also political importance. MinRat Dr.Siegert (Reichsf.-, Sipo) joined this view.