English Translation

- 23 - 4.2 as well as the boots of the storer. Further he admits to his Kanerads Naas, Sincn and Fricse the Betrüg-reion charged to him. He also does not deny having miscarried the above-mentioned urn and carried the orders and rank drawings of a -undersignal leader, the defendant Buhlmeyer is sonit because of the letter to don ¿-Obersturmführer Arnold and for the sake of Rui 40.-- of the /-man Bertignol of the nilitarian subjugation (proceedings against 6 138 lStGB, § 246 RStGB) and because of dcr boots of ;-Strn.He, Zer des zilitischen Thefts ( § 138 MiStGB , § 242 RSt GB ). He has been guilty of fraud by his behaviour against his comrade Kaas, Friese and Simon in accordance with § 263 RStcB. He has refrained from obtaining a unlawful asset advantage, which damages the delay of his comrades dadurcil,you have durek. Illustrated false facts in them an error. Furthermore, in several cases he has forgotten the letters from l.ei l940 to the circle leader and from 2y Juil l94C to the family Bühlneyer, sovie the identification document of l.August l94o; the confirmation of 14. ugust 1940 uid the driving order of 17.August 1940 stollon, de sie pit einer Dienststepel provided sinä, public documents. The Angoklagte Bühlmeyer falsely made them unfinished and muttered them from the eaves and the identification card also for the purpose of the tuechung use. He achieved that ien gifts were given in the papers faith and the papers themselves were kept ftr genuine. By the creation - of the E.K.1, E.k.2 and the wounded assign in April and in August 1940 he kat the preconditions of the § 6 para. 1 Zife.b of the Law on Titles, Orders and Signs of the l. July lgz7. He carried domestic orders without permission. Endiich is in violation of § 132 a.RStGB by the fact that he autonomously applied the sign of a Signatory in August l940. The individual misconducts, to the extent that they concerned the same penal law, in each case in continuation of the law. From the personality of the defendant, the visitation of the acts and the timing, it follows that the defendant Bühlneyer acted out of a uniform decision of will. From the E.K.2 in April 1994O to his: Arrest in August l940 on the occasion of the wearing of the E,K.1,