STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2045, sig. 109-7/52

Page 15

English Translation

7a - 14 - was therefore still under command and was in military service, especially at the time of flight the judgment given against him,which was issued on prison, expulsion from the M and unworthy of defence, was not yet confirmed by vow courtlords and was therefore not yet legally valid. The negligent Bühlmeyer did not know exactly his own confession of do not intend to escape. According to his own leaders, he agreed to support the escape plan and, to a large extent, gave the fugitives much help. He advised the flight plan and gave essential clues for the success of the escape. He left clothes and identification papers to the fumigants, and he also gave them money. In the morning of 22 October 1994 he made possible the unhindered suspension of his imprisonment by a false report to the authorities, which was made possible by Freyborg's agreement. He was also the one who expressed his own plans to escape and thus strengthened the defendants Spitzig and Freyborg in their intrepidity. After his speeches during the entire period of imprisonment about escape possibilities, he must be regarded as a spiritual author of the act. Even after clarification of the successful escape he turned himself ignorant and admitted the true facts only after a high under the burden of the evidence. Through this behavior he has made the seizure of the fugitives extremely difficult. The defendant, Bihlmeyer, is thus guilty of aiding the flag flight according to § 7O MStGB, § 49 RStGB. The defendant Jochimsen, after his own admission, did not want to have anything to do with the flight of his comrades. He was the only one who directed inside and pointed out the dangerous nature of the Untcrnehuen. The defendants Spitzig, Freyborg and Billmeyer have confirmed that Jochimsen did not have anything to do with the whole thing. He did not give any advice and kept himself completely away from the deliberations on the escape. Through the dedication of Ril 2.--he did not want the escape request, but he gave d&s money only to have ua before his canerades cndlich nuhe. The court believes him that by his initial denial after fleeing the fugitives did not undo and promote the success of the deed. Hach the other lialtung dosangegegebente Jochimsen is the court 41972