STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1641, sig. 109-4/1396 Page 59 · 59 of 102
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1641, sig. 109-4/1396
English Translation
(6 - 50 - from May I942 at the earliest with the incorrect management of the stores. Only since the 2.7.l942 its direct responsibility as head of the meat shopping department again re-establishes. In this position he has still tolerated some black-eye laughter of the wall, but above all on 27.7.l942 contributed significantly to the fiefing of the intended further black slaughters. What distinguishes him despite the quite extensive overall activity of Bradaß and Wall is his subjective attitude towards the whole machinations. He did not take advantage of his participation in value terms in 1940/4l, nor in 1942. He was the head of the department responsible for maintaining his job, who felt free from the ultimate internal responsibility, in fact had no decisive influence on the decisions taken by the management and could only give advice. In the year l942 .er was practically only the henchman of the accused wall, who had intimidated and held the whole followers of the Postex and gagged. While he still felt solidariseh with the board's measures and did not remain involved in perpetrators' will, he was clearly under the pressure and shadow of the overpowering Central Director Wall, which must also be kept to his benefit. He is, after all his personal impression, a basically dependent Batur and would certainly not have become a war criminal without the environmental effects. For these reasons, a particularly difficult case was to be denied, but according to the extent of his participation, the degree of his insight and the degree to which he was responsible for a sensitive sentence of imprisonment in the amount of s e c h s J a h r e n. Stübchen and Klaß were first inaugurated to the defendants Bradaë in most of the convicted machinations. TC Ra T therefore weighs very hard from the outset. However, they were, on the other hand, much less involved in the implementation measures than Bradac, Wall and Pospißil and knew them only in rough outlines and without accurate insight into the methods and probably also in the