STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1472, sig. 109-4/1226 Page 56 · 56 of 106
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1472, sig. 109-4/1226
English Translation
3. 54 qn The verification and comparison of the invoice submitted with the documents and assistance cited for this purpose has led to the following findings: The invoice submitted does not correspond to the supporting documents and supporting documents, with the exception of a payment to the forwarding companyKirehenberger, Prag, for removal costs (document A l7/l2), which in the calculation have been rejected and declared K 2.956.-. However, the amount paid to Aen Architekten Böhn for the conversion and refurbishing of equipment is thus reduced by ..........K 48o.l63.5o as compared with the previous difference in the calculation of......K 479.163.50 if the amount of Ronorar paid to Böhn under test periods (point 6) was in accordance with ...25.ooo. In the event that this honourer obligation of K 35.ooo.--, which does not appear to be substantiated by Rechmng, is confirmed by the duties of the Böhmische Eacompte Bank and Gre- ditanstalt, the transfer is effected int, does not go into order, then the conversion costs will still be reduced and zvar will be reduced............................K 444.l63.50.