STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1459, sig. 109-4/1213 Page 151 · 151 of 156
THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1459, sig. 109-4/1213
English Translation
37 - 5 - With regard to Ing. R y s, it has been confirmed that despite the prohibition of the civil administration and the guidelines given here to the IXth Section of the Agricultural Ministry, the same person has granted further permits for land sales. Ing Rys claims that the wording of this order, as well as that contained in two circulars of the IX. Section of the Ministry of Agriculture issued instructions, which is why he Dr. Michl of the IX. However, it is clear from the fact that the Court of Justice of the European Communities has held that, in the event of a failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 85(3) of the EC Treaty, it has failed to fulfil the obligations conferred on it by Article 85(1) of the Treaty, the Court has failed, in so far as it is concerned, to adopt a decision on the application of Article 85(2) of the EEC Treaty. In addition, the testimony of the witness Dr. Michl n a c h e g e w e s e n that the wording of the circular letter and the entire impact of the soil, including the authorization to sell it from the very first hand, and that this must be the case for the Ing. Rys be - k a n t. For the errors at the Prague district office, the section head Dr. Novak, who, as the Executive Board of the IX Section, is already preoccupied with strict compliance with the order, expressed hingowiosen vurde. However, he could not yet be heard in this Angelogenheit. Ing. Rys also admits that in the case of various cases of land allocation, in particular in Brevnov, Gbell, Zlenice, there are, in fact, cases where the whole of the locality was spoken of, but claims not to have participated in these allocations. In the above, he sought to comply with the law and its authority in so far as it was necessary under the given circumstances: