STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 332, sig. 109-4/76

Page 14

English Translation

12 -@ intervene in the governance and clearly dominate it. Then a real state power would be available to his economic policy. Also from the Tsohechian point of view would sit thee Po litik, i.e. a policy for all cases, and for the present circumstances it would be a significant strengthening of the technical one, to whom one wishes, of the Czechoslovak Fosition in Slovakia. The Bradlo was attended by prominent guests: the sehon-mentioned Preßburg professor Mßkovid, the Slo-Wak Koneul in Vienna Vávra, the manufacturer Huber from Vienna and other representatives from Slovakia. The Národopisná Morava was also invited, but it did not participate. But the two brothers Sumbera were there, and the Antonin gave the feast the greetings of the Národopiená Morave without having had any excitement. Sehon at the front of the Bradlo celebration and then on 21st of April there were calculations between Ryba and Konorten and Prof. Miškoviő. Ee is said to have been discussed in order to raise the Slovenian people's awareness in Moravian Slovakia, the establishment of a Slovenská národní strana (Slovak national parbi) and the issue of a newspaper entitled Moravaký Slovák (The Mihrische Slowake). Trigger of the organization should be the officially unparticipated Národopianá Morava - apparently for camouflage reasons. The meeting at l5. took place in Hungarian-Brod. Lecturer was Miökovič. The approval for the lecture was given by a certain podola from Hungarian-brod, a person who is in a closer business connection with the company Bata. After the celebration of Havnička, the above-mentioned Cdete and a narrower circle of their followers were invited to a plague dinner, practically for a confidential discussion. A second lecture of the Mškovič should - after notification of Antonin Sumbera on the examination of the Národo- piená Morava - rise in Hungarian-Hradisch. The leadership of the Národopianá Morava should be able to take the lead. However, it refused. This lot-of-prag movement, as it can be seen in this P dea d c, reached the peak when the board of the Slovak foreign institute Prof. Miëkovië on 1 April 1994 gave a round-trip