English Translation

8. When, according to the decree of the State-Grundamt in Prague of 8.Jänner 1930 number 146.417/29_11-1, Liblin was excluded from the parcel according to 20 of the apportionment, the large-scale property Liblin had to be obliged to read the ruins of Libstein to the public. Also in paragraph III.lautes it: The park should be accessible to the audience. The municipality only received this provision after 5 years. It did not allow it to be reported immediately for its rights. However, the State Grundamt had read the attribution of the municipality unantowortet and the Ministry of Education,which sent an official to Liblin to investigate the matter, did not behave better. The official was a guest for 3 days in the castle and the municipality of Liblin, after his return, received an attribution to the following contents : Prague, on 26.XI.1934 Subject : Liblin estate. Leave of the immovable property according to § 20 reply z.Zahl 591/34 vom 5.Xi.19 34. Gemeindeamt Liblin. At your request of November 5, 1934, number 591/34 is announced to anenen, that the participation of the Ministry of Education and Culture, upon leaving the realities according to § 20 of the Zuteilg. Act, is limited to the protection and safeguarding of the memory. The State Land Office in Prague will decide on the rules of visit after the final decision of the State Land Agency is issued on conditions under § 20 of the Participating Act. For the Minister: signature illegible. However, the State Grundamt has not issued a decision to date. But something else happened.The burdens cited, as well as the restrictions, pass as real burdens on every successor at Kučera, but the burdens entered in the country table were extinguished, the power of Kučera was so great that the community remained silent and did nothing anyway,that not their rights,but also the constitutions of the republic were kicked by a person with feet, who atx like every common murderer is registered in the criminal albun. Can you then be surprised if Kučere does what he wants? He paid his workers men Kč l.--per 1 hour. His officials, administrators Jar.Zoubek and Ing.Fr.Hřebiček in an effort to please his Brothermen compete in tyrannizing the unions and in provoking disputes with the community. And yet something happened which gave a shock to his pride. Not by justice, not even by the officials who are supposed to protect the laws, nor by the community, which was too weak to defend their rights.The blow came from the Moravian Agricultural Bank, which owed Kučera a large amount. It did not help him to have the statue of Minister President Anton Švehla made at his own expense in the year l934. This statue is still lost today. When Kučera and his 3 partners were assigned 5ooo ha forest in Dlouhá Lhota, the bank borrowed the money from him. According to him, he should owe the bank 18.000.000.--. He plundered the forests and the wood was sold. The bank filed the lawsuit against him. He remained guilty of the republic, which has allocated to him this huge forest complex in taxes 520.oo0 Kč /at the tax office in Dobrisch 260.000 Kč and as much in Přibram/.The mentioned bank, which borrowed money from Kučera on this object, sued him at the commercial court in Prague on l4.000.000.--Kč, because of the exchange obligations,as on the part of Kužera,as also on the behalf of his friend F.J.Pokorný,the former director of this bank, now owner of the large estate Chřič. The first process in the amount of Kč 6.000.000.--the bank has won and let this sum both