STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1363, sig. 109-4/1117 Page 26 · 26 of 221
A SOCIETY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1363, sig. 109-4/1117
English Translation
- 3 - /:0.5 m Difference between the position of the driver in the car interior and the outer wall. 1 m distance of the motorcycle from the roofed pavement edge to the powder tower, according to the driver Koči:/ No.2 : estimate of the car driver Trněný 3m - 0.5 m ......2.5 m No.3 : About half the car box length -1m back.........3.75 m All in all ........10.75. It can be assumed that the driver of the line ll had about ll m for braking. In reality, the braking path and thus also the speed at the moment of the start of the brake was significantly lower if one takes into account the reciprocal movement of all three vehicles, the necessary but different reaction time and the loss of time when the braking devices are operated. However, even if we consider this l0.75 m as the whole operating Brensbahn directly, the speed at the start of the brake is 20.7 km/h and is therefore significantly lower than the permissible 28 km/hour speed. We have considered the incident even as if it had not come to a collision at all. In this case, in the same initial situation between the two opposite trains at the end of the braking in the track axis, at least one car sequence interval yon l to l.5 m would have remained/:for perfect passage of the motorcycle with sidecars in the arch:/.The operating brake track would follow only on the basis of the above mentioned: 1/ 4.5 m - 1.5 = 3 m d.i. the rest of Bergmanngasse. 2/ 2.5 m remains 2.5 m - according to the driver Trněný Together .... 5.5 m If, at the moment of the start of the braking process, we require the mentioned speed of 20.7 kn, the braking device of the train would have to develop an average delay of at least 2.7 - 2.9 m/sec2,which in the given conditions 2