STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 1452, sig. 109-4/1206 Page 5 · 5 of 37
THE SECRETARY TO THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1452, sig. 109-4/1206
English Translation
Copy! THE PROTECTOR OF REICTS in Bohemia and Moravia No. I 3 a - 9440/Ww/22/43 Prague, the 16th century. June 1943 To the Ministry of the Interior Pra g-VII Sommerbergstr.69 Subject: Release of non-purpose Nohnraum by public services and private enterprises I have found that a large number of clouds are still occupied by public departments and private businesses. In accordance with the rule in the rest of the Reich, according to which all non-purpose residential buildings are to be re-used, I ask to take the following measures: 1. In order to obtain a general overview of the number of non-utilized dwellings, these are to be determined by the municipalities without distinction as to whether they are used by public services or private firms. (b) by a ministerial decree, the Government Decree No 103/1943 5 6 paragraph 1 Z. The municipalities have to determine all the alternative areas arising under the Government Regulations Nos 44/1943 and 103/1943 as well as my Regulation VB1 p. 53/I943. 3. The municipalities also have to prepare for the relocation of the services and enterprises located in housing. To this end, they have to draw up plans for the relocation of larger public services or private enterprises after comparison of the space requirements and the existing alternative areas. These plans are, in the case of relocation of large public services and private enterprises, and a two-way agreement has not been reached between the municipality and the department to be relocated or the district to be transferred, to be submitted to the regional authority for approval. If the state authority agrees to the relocation plan, it must be binding on the relocation body and must arrange for implementation. Experience shows that the relocation will be particularly suitable for public and private bodies and establishments with temporary residences. 4. In order to ensure a smooth implementation of the relocation, the municipalities must continue to draw up timetables in which the order of settlement is determined.