STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2343, sig. 109-11/145 Page 74 · 74 of 77
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2343, sig. 109-11/145
English Translation
58 .1 -- When assessing the secret character of the list of names, the following considerations must be taken into account: facts which are not individually kept secret and which are also accessible to public perception may nevertheless be secrets when they are communicated to others, and especially when a list-based summary of such facts is used. For example, a single troop transport is perceptible to many people, who somehow get to see him on duty or not on duty. However, it must be seen as a breach of a secret when someone communicates to outsiders via a series of such transpor- tions in a summarised, clear list form. Here, too, the convictions of the defendant to Dr. Shebek stated that he had taken part in a public meeting, so that in itself an unlimited number of totally non-participants could have heard them in the main hearing, but a review of a number of such convictions is nevertheless a provision of a material which is otherwise not accessible to outsiders, that must be all the more valid from a list of main negotiations to be held, especially if it is not yet clear whether the proceedings will not be secret and whether the parties will be kept silent. The defendant was sufficiently knowledgeable in the various industrial circles and in high positions of authority and authority similar to those dealt with in the defence of the country after the court had been established in such courts to see that he had made statements which went beyond the scope of what he was allowed to say as a participant in a public trial. The defendant had obtained this knowledge in the course of his duties for the authority. Moreover, he should have made at least the impression that the protectorate emissary refused, for quite peculiar reasons, to obtain the knowledge she wanted from the secret state police, which the accused himself considered to be permanent for this purpose. In addition, the defendant would have had the opportunity to send the delegation to the administrative authorities at that time.