STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 1504, sig. 109-4/1258 (damaged)

Page 186

English Translation

151a bb/ At Josef Marek, the control remained undisturbed. 2/ Tieng aa/ The Anton FrühThe gable of the buildings unpunished and fell under the garland on the reservoir. The bricks with the sand mixed with the grain so that he could not make the correct report to this day. bb/ Franz Trnka has wrongly applied the success of the harvest, but correctly handed over the whole quantity of cereals before the inspection to the Commissioner. 3/ Wolducha aa/ Wenzel Nekola has indicated that he did not weigh the cereals,but only estimated them. bb / Wenze Červený has stated the same thing kee, which is already stated with Wence Nekol. Wenceslas Červený has not yet offered the larger length of 550 kg Veizen and 29ó kg Rye/Commissioner to buy out. The report on the grain is already mentioned above. e/ On December 20, 1941, the inspections in the municipalities of Woleschna near Sbirow, Hesnowitz,Litochlau and Rolitzan were presided over. Sbirows as/ At Josef Novak the control remained undisturbed. bb/ At Anton Jágr the control was undistorted. 2/ Hesnowitzt aa/ Anton Houlis took the view that he miscalculated the state of the harvest. BB/ Rudolf Horn, according to his statement, was ill during the harvest and everything weighed for him his spouse. 3/ Litochlaus aa / Bein Franz Lukeğ remained the control unsuccessful. bb/ The success of the control at Wenzel Hejl is such as at Fronz Lukeš - unsuccessful. 4//Rokitzanz aa/ At Adalbert Šedivec the control remained unsuccessful. bb / Marie Burešová pointed out that the difference was due to the fact that it has taken advantage of the quantity of cereals, whereas at the control the grain was weighed. All in all it is necessary to say that, in all cases, except the case of Wenzel Červený in Wolduchjum, there are errors 59415