STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2337, sig. 109-11/139

Page 65

English Translation

€2 46 of the opening decision Individual sentences of four months, fifteen days in prison, which were converted to three months in prison in accordance with § 2l StGB. for the purpose of forming a total sentence, and from these individual sentences, subject to the two-year penitentiary sentence, as an operating sentence according to § 74 RStGB. On the other hand, the defendant, Jude Dr. Kafka, had to be appointed in the following cases of the opening decision for the defendant: 9. in the case of Hildegard Kreher, because in this case the experts Dr. Weimann and Dr. Wagner could not come to a clear conclusion in her report on this case; l. in the case of Eva Noten, because, according to the expert's report, at the time of interruption, the possibility of renal inflammation could not be ruled out, which would have meant a risk to the pregnant woman's life if pregnancy were carried out; 12. in the case of Erika Slevogt, because the witness fell shortly before her trip to Karlovy Vary and therefore, according to the expert's opinion, it cannot be ruled out that there has been a major injury which revealed the necessity of the interruption; 14 in the case of Magdalena Neynaber, because according to the expert's report, it cannot be ruled out that at that time there was a heart enlargement with the witness and the defendant was therefore entitled to interrupt pregnancy; l6. in the case of Elfriede Funke, because, after the expert's opinion, there was the possibility of an abortus in progress, 18. in the event of Erika Rehme, because according to the expert opinion, in this case, the possibility for an indication to be interrupted cannot be excluded, especially since it is