NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 522, sig. 110-4/370 (poškozeno) Page 32 · 32 of 40
Germany'S MINISTRY FOR CHEATURES AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 522, sig. 110-4/370 (damaged)
English Translation
28a The very essential provision in the Reichsgesetz, that a pharmacy is also to be leased if the owner is unreliable in national or moral terms, is missing here. And it is precisely such a provision that I have always considered particularly necessary for the Protectorate, for example in the form: "The state authority can order the lease of a public apotheke even if the owner is unreliable according to the nature of his personal guidance or according to his professional practice or has indicated that he is not prepared to work for the special needs of health guidance in the protectorate at any time." Otherwise, the new lease regulation would only be aligned according to technical aspects but not political aspects. Some things should be remembered for form. For legal reasons, according to § 1 paragraph 1 could not be spoken of by a tnhaber of a public pharmacy, if it is operated only on behalf of the widow. The Reichsfassung would therefore be much better, for example: "A public pharmacy is to be leased ........... In § 2, paragraph b, at least the maintenance of an addiction must also be stated as a lease ground, if one does not want to pass to the text of the Reichsgesetz at all 60829 In §2, paragraph 2, it must obviously be called "§1, paragraph 2" instead of "§ 1, paragraph 2", since there is no paragraph 3 in § 1. Furthermore, in § 2 it must be added that 1b and 1c should only apply for the duration of the disability. ,dosn Jivienk reniel In § 3 the term "responsible director" is not very happy, since in paragraph 1 he can only include one administrator, but in paragraph 3 he can include both a tenant and an administrator. Nor is the term of "removement" in section 3 of § 3 happy. One would better set off on "solution of the lease contract" or "failure of his confirmation". ib As regards § 4 and § 6,2 it is to be said that the competent professional representation of the pharmacist's office should not approve the lease or its amendment and should then submit it to the national authority, but that, in reverse, the state authority, after consulting the professional representative of the chemists, would have to issue the authorization. § 6 and § 7 should also be noted that the decisions of the national authorities are final. § 1 is not based on detailed provisions, but on the legal and administrative provisions required for implementation.