STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2768, sig. 109-16/3 Page 131 · 131 of 209
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2768, sig. 109-16/3
English Translation
410210 In the fight against crime by the police, these phenomena have not yet been sufficiently taken into account, so they need to be expanded in order to achieve a full impact. This enlargement must be made possible by the possibility for the criminal police to take into account the principle of prevention in a way that can influence the development of children and young people who have been subjected to criminal criminal offences, particularly the descendants of professional and habitual criminals. This would not least be in the interest of the children and young people themselves. The following decree of the RMdI of 24. 5. 1939 (RMBliV. p. 1181, Newsletter A p. 161) states which measures are to be taken in this context. Reichszen- (1) In the context of the preventive fight against crime trale to combat by the Poles becomes with the 1. 7. In 1939, the Reichskriminalpolizei- der Jugend- amt established a "Reichszentrallstelle zur Ausführung der Jugendkriminali- kriminalität" (Reich Central Office for Combating Youth Crime). (2) The task of the Reich Central Police Office is the criminal police surveillance of children and young people who appear to be criminally burdened. (3) In this sense, the Pole's successors are the first to be recorded. known as professional and habitual offenders. (4) Measures may be taken: (a) the ongoing examination of the living conditions of children and young people who have been subjected to crime; (b) the establishment of accommodation in suitable families or in care education by the youth services in the event of danger of neglect; (c) the use of police means of coercion in accordance with paragraph 14.12.1937 - Pol. S-Kr. 3 Nr. 1682/37-2098 (not published) if the measures ordered under (b) have failed, or after a careful examination by the authorities in accordance with RJWG. v. 9. 12. 1922 (RGBl. I p. 633) appear unsuccessful.