English Translation

2 953 dor e d o Constitutional instrument is impossible. A large part of what is requested is contrary to individual provisions of the Constitutional instrument, other points cannot at least be compared with the spirit and meaning of the constitutional provisions. In particular, the Constitution contradicts the following points : l. The Red tspersonality of whole ethnic groups /Page 2/ is not comparable to the Constitution's instrument of constitution, which in essence only expects individual citizens and in §5 131 and 132 important parts of the "citizens belonging to national minorities" does not, however, know the Constitution Henra national groups as independent legal entities. The question of the protection of the legal rights of nationalities and the establishment of bodies which, by asserting this protection, are pageq2 is different. A particular area of a particular ethnic group / pages 2 and 3 / is in direct contrast to § 3 of the Constitution, which actually makes sense to prevent the division of the state into special national territories. 3. The legislative activity of the newly granted self-government units /page 3 and the following / contradicts § 6 of the Constitutional Act whose purpose is to prevent the emergence of a special state legistative. 4. The formation of national curias in the National Assembly / page 6/ requires explicitly the om p oae d d ser de s sa e aae a se g, also of § 13 of the Constitution. 5. The construction of the request that the Chairman of the People's Representation / page 8 / ipso facto Minister of State , who is not responsible for the National Assembly , is in a shabby discretion to the provisions of the 5§ 70 and 75 of the 6. The regulation of the appointment of certain civil servants / page ll/ cannot be brought into line with the provisions of § 64 of the constitution. 7. Whether national cadastres / page 4/ would correspond to the constitution would only be necessary.