NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 334, sig. 110-4/180 Page 77 · 77 of 95
THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 334, sig. 110-4/180
English Translation
2 C9 has a large apartment,Lindenstr.4,which was previously occupied by the Czech director of the mountain hut,Dr.Moder.)In this interview, Mr. v.Bardeleben classified Mr. Schmelzer in content terms and gave him no figures on questions,but only noted that the staff can provide information about this.This attitude applies only to the first three months of the trial,and the correct recruitment is then achieved after the expiry of this period by the main administrative desks. Mr. Schmelzer then inquired at the Karwin employment office, where he learned that he would be ranked in the lowest level for beginners at all.Mr. Schellzer believed in a mistake that he had made after a few days with Dr. Schicketanz, who wanted to make the correction at the entrance of the recruitment letter and gave Mr. Smelzer the best professional confidence. Mr.Schmelzer sent the employment letter to Dr. Schicketanz after a couple of days. At the end of three months, Mr. Schmelzer asked for his final appointment and assignment of a job, and made several proposals about it, and again submitted his testimonies.In particular,Mr. Schellzer asked that the hardly bearable domestic maladministration be put off and that he would finally come to his family, especially since at the same time in Karwin, indescribable opposites were known. Mr. Schmelzer received only after another four weeks the telephone call from the Lord, i.e. where he confirmed the reception of the scream and said that a place might be possible in the coking plant of the Königshütte.Mr. Scheller went straight to Königs Hut, visited the plant with the factory manager, Mr. Ober, and, despite the amazement of Mr. Mr. Schmelzer was given the written notice after another four weeks that one would agree, but an apartment would not be put into question until the summer of 1943 and even then would not still be in question and a salary would also be considered which would be far below that of a beginner's firm. Mr v.Bardeleben made the marginal remark on the letter, he strongly advised Mr. Schmelzer to accept this post. Mr. v.Bardeleben at the same time,where he forced Mr. Schmelzer from the mining industry into the Königshütte,in Moravian Ostrau-Ignatzschacht- Kokerei a Czech gentleman from Trinitz,who is considered impossible by local experts.In addition,Mr. Bardeleben was beaten by Mr.Schmelzer yorg when he was hired (by H.Cobiet-Karwin) that there is an urgent need for a specialist at the Kokerei Ignazschachte in Mhrt-ostrau, since the manager there himself cannot prove the practice of codification and that only two Czech gentlemen are given the support.Mr. V.Bardeleben rejected this proposal with the remark that the Protektorate for Mr. Melzer did not come into question because Mr. Schnmelzer had good relations with Prague. On 31 October 1942 Mr. Schmelzer's landlord, Mr. Kerndorff-Karwin, received a police order from the mayor under the rule to clear the apartment by 7 November 1942 at the latest, since there is a risk of collapse and the construction work had to start before the frost began. Mr. Schmelzer immediately informed his head of the company, who himself often asked the construction department of the mountain hut for the termination of these conditions of Mr. Smelzer.On that day, Mr. Zmelzer, HerrvOberinsp.Cobiet from the head of construction Dr. Czihal, received the answer:I have the order from above,Mr. Schmol- zer To the further question,who would have given the order from above,the answer:Mr. v.Bardele- ben.(Note that Dr. Czihal came to Mr. Cobiet after three days and made these accusations that he would have literally reproduced this to Herr Schmelzer, moreover, this order would not have been Herr v. Bardele.