English Translation

9 - 34 - In the l6 cases listed in II of the judgment, it has, through the willing acceptance of the interventions ordered to it, reminded the relatives of prisoners to have political influence on the execution of protective custody, custody or custody by exploiting fabricated relations with Secretary of State K.H.Frank and other leading personalities, although she knew that she was unable to do so. Through the deliberately false assertion of such relations, she misplaced the petitioners and the petitioner that, when paying the required expenses or by placing the bails required by her as a prerequisite for successful efforts, she could and also wanted to help out with the requests for release or relief, while in reality, from the outset, she only intended to consume the money entrusted to her for herself, the applicants who had been deceived in this way, in their belief in the existence of the alleged possibilities of influence of the accused Novak, in the amount of a total of 725,000 K, to which the accused had no legal claim, according to their knowledge. Thus the external and internal preconditions of the fraud are fulfilled in the sense of § 263 StGB. The defendant Novak acted in the intention to obtain a contributional source of income for himself in order to be able to continue her usual life as a great lady even after the disappearance of her so far enduring lovers. In carrying out this overall plan, she has always misled and exploited her victims in the same way. Therefore, apart from the unity of her intention, which includes the overall success, there is also similarity of the action directed against the same legal property in all individual cases. She is therefore guilty of continuing fraud.When she committed the crime, she acted to a very unusual extent maliciously and, through her conduct, also significantly harmed the welfare of the people: