English Translation

10 -6 * sngeklagte " since the outbreak of war until November 3rd lg43 fortlau- fend " the news of englisgher stations had heard. This continued listening would at least be interrupted by the not insignificant peasants of the internment, who in the Protchjoll no mention of fin- det,. For this reason alone, the accused Prince de Rchan could not be determined on his political confession. Therefore, even to the extent of his confession based on the facts, the defendant de Ruhan is considered to be convicted in the main trial, which coincides with the confession of his judicial interrogation on February 25, 1944. In conclusion, it should be noted that the defendants, Count C z e r n i n and Count K i n s k y, were not sufficiently sure that foreign broadcasts could be broadcast by common listening. In this respect, however, a partial acquittal was out of the question, since the indictment had brought an action between the interception of foreign radio news and its distribution. The legal assessment shows that the three defendants have been guilty of a continuing crime within the meaning of § 1 of the Ordinance vcm 1.September l939 - RGBl.I.S.l6 due to the more or less frequent deliberate interception of foreign channels. The continuation of the appeal must be concluded from the Vcraatz, which is clearly recognizable after the admission of all defendants, and not from a certain regularity the foreigner must be heard. The postponement of § 5 of the above-mentioned appeal is fulfilled by the application for a penalty by the secret state police, state police station in Prague, dated 24 December 1973. The defendants, Count C z e r n i n and Count K i n s k y, admit that from the outset they have been aware of the illegality of listening to foreign radio stations, Count Ki n sk y with the additional remark that he had not been aware that the violation of the law he had known was severely punished, as had been presented to him during the course of the proceedings. Only the defendant, Prince de Rohan, said that he could believe that he had erred in the scope of the violated norm.