STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 2041, sig. 109-7/48 Page 129 · 129 of 70
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2041, sig. 109-7/48
English Translation
ABLA Zn I 104/33 of the defendant Dr Karlik in the cause of the suspended place of spi-su and return to the court of the first stool, to renegotiate it within the scope of this judgment and to reshape it. Otherwise, everything is the case with regard to the defendant Mr Šiwel. Or the court will dismiss this defendant, among other things, because he didn't take the case as a proven subjective charge of the defendant on his own account--and to his defense that he relied on Dr. Karlík in that way. That the ob-seh file is criminal-free, since Dr. Charles is a trained lawyer and an executive attorney. Hüže zūstati side by side, whether this statement ye in all directions complies with the law in the form and legal form, or if the difficulty does not attack him either on either side or on the other side, and therefore the statement remains the same for the graining owl - binding. It follows from what has been stated that the finding of probes in this direction also excludes subjective guilty persons from the dūvodū completely different from those from those who ruled out the fact that the act of misdeed according to ğu ll. cust. na ochr. rep. on the part of the objective, so that on all sides the acquittal düvod, built on the indefensible subjective guilt of the defendant, was not even in this cause possible to comply with the confusion of the state prosecutor's complaint against the liberated defendant inż. Siwela and was therefore dismissed as in all respects unwitting. In Brno, on 30 October 1933. Dr Pokorny v.r. Dr Tawelka v.v. For the correctness of the production of the headmaster of the expedition: fluee 5 O U Panu Ing. Václavu š i w e l o v i A II-GZBαd Lipová ul.čislo 20 na vězně. The Regional Criminal Court in Prague, oddšl. XII on 23 December 1933. Emanuel Sitta.