STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 2041, sig. 109-7/48

Page 127

English Translation

131a 2 Zu I 10 that the probes do not have the proof that the defendant, Shiwel, would sahncuti of the misguided intent, - the intention in § ll 2 of the ref. indicated - or that at least he had to be aware, by saying he may have been able to eat apparently from the stressed service and needles and the circumstance of what he or she would have or her. page is acquitted also with confusion of the activni on but find out