English Translation

— 5 We will not protect ourselves with any Catholics, nor do we play a great, but not a judge, who considers the Nazi world view to be the decisive role in the activity of which it is not binding on itself, and we will be guided by the political expediencies that the Nazi view of the world considers to be fair without in individual cases in the sense of a private matter, which the individual is obliged to be equal to guilt and atonement. It is, therefore, true that although the tasks of the criminal points clearly indicate the position of the front, which I have already pointed out to the police and the police in the same direction, the dogma of an old right-wing opinion is that their measures are fundamentally different from the explosive force of a new world to which considerations are based. Here, however, every single legal practice is now more acute than ever the need for a clear distinction between the mutual effects and not always visible with its work on the national area. Perhaps it is precisely socialism that has to confess. Here the struggle for this fact leads to the attacks on the police and enforcement of the National Socialist idea into their actions? What have we led to as in other life-styles?? Only apparently it is about concepts It is true that the police do not always stand up to such legal certainty or judicial independence. Is it really the case that, as Fr a n k says, we are in the sense that we have limited the elementary popular sense described? In the last few years it has in many cases also taken over the correction of inadequate criminal sentences in arbitrarily sacrificing the property acquired in the form of life, freedom, honour and honest property. That is in the inner difficulties of the side-shifting, completely indifferent things? Today our courts work justice, partly also in certain inadequacies which are no longer just as steady and in their jurisdiction of our penal laws. Our valid criminality unchallenged as at the time of the so celebrated right did not at first always guarantee the liberal rule of law? Yes, but the police! This was both contrary to us; the police, with their concentration on the individual offences, as well as their detention, their executions, their preventive detention visibly the case of the individual criminal frameworks. If so, etc.! Almost every day it says in the newspaper: The Reichsführer-żý informs that he or she is shot, for example, to remember that only in the previous year has it been done. Without a verdict! Here the death penalty for moral criminals has been introduced a priest who had been acquitted by the court, so you have spent only one of numbers in the concentration camp; there you have a rich example in which our criminal law has offered disenfranchised fellow citizens sufficient punishment for some hateful expulsions. against the National Socialist state after the penalty- One can still argue about it on this point, serving the same done. Everything without judge- whether it is a correction or a supplement to the judicial sentence! Is this not that arbitrary, brutality, if in such cases it the police over- and unilateral use of force. that defense took, through the healthy popular feeling, de-void of condemnation. the Frank recently always relevant measures to compensate these deficiencies. to have to denounce again? Without a doubt, the correction of criminal justice is in the middle of the discussion of a policy against all those police measures, with problems that we need to examine more closely, because the aim is to counteract the often too softly precisely here our enemies and also numerous jurisprudence of the judiciary. These of our peoples express the threat to the legal measures, especially in the shootings which you have experienced and in the independence of the judge. It must be noted that efforts are being made to do so. We have the concept of these shootings in each individual case by legal certainty, if we are to trigger this catched word a leader's order, that it is still in use here and not rather to say, in other words, that we do not want to say so-called 'welcome arbitrariness' in the meantime to clarify the relative frequency of the attempts. It was important to realise that for us to be aware of such shootings is merely a prerequisite for securing the rights of a fairly frequent failure of the judiciary, for individuals to be the security of the people's community; the causes of which I come even closer to speaking. We are aware that, without this security, there is no guaranteed right of police and criminal justice. Let us take some risks from this starting point, which is detrimental to a healthy legal system, and must be accompanied by measures taken by the police. However, at first we do not have any legal care, the police are responsible for securing the perfectly sound legal order. We are responsible within the people's order. A certain one also in the war, which imposes special laws on the individual as well as the overlapping of the activities of these two communities. What is important is that, for example, within the judiciary, we can only observe the basis of their activities politically correctly, and that we have to exclude them. Ordinary measures, if not by means of an In the context of their task to secure the people's order in the wrongly understood legal certainty of the Reichssicher- Innere, it is up to the administration of criminal law to be threatened. It is only necessary to atone for the wrong committed by the wrong-doers numerous misjudgments of the judiciary against Polish and thereby to exercise justice in individual cases. In this context, the European Parliament has called on the Member States to take the necessary steps to ensure that the European Union is able to meet its obligations under the Treaty of Rome and the Treaty on European Union in the light of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.