English Translation

3a — 4 can be considered as the use of general if he is to be bound in the community of his clauses such as "Treu and Faith" or "good people and associated with their fate customs" etc. to be avoided as far as possible. Legal certainty therefore sees only those whose interpretation is substantially threatened by the personal one who does not subordinate himself to these bonds from an internal, non-foreseeable attitude to the obligation, but rather is dependent on them as an external court judge. An act may only be punishable if, moreover, We have recognized that it is precisely the criminal characteristics precisely defined by a legal, abstract concept of legal certainty: the abstract concept which is taken up in existence. What the individual expects as a result of strict attachment of the judge to the letter of his deed must also be predictable law, the prohibition of the creation of rights in criminal and determinable. What is not forbidden is right, the party-shaped criminal proceedings etc., that it allows precisely the gap between the original 4. In the criminal proceedings, the defendant is treated as equal to the state's sense of law of the people and the real lawyer. In this connection, the Court of Justice of the European Communities held that, in the light of the Court's judgment in the main proceedings, the Commission had failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 85(1) of the Treaty, and that the Court had failed in its judgment to fulfil the obligations laid down in Article 85(2) of the EEC Treaty. Right and the lawyers in whose activity they see you, that this concept of legal certainty consciously or unconsciously sensed a foreign spirit a system of various bonds of all. Organs which could expose the individual unforeseeable We have suspended ourselves from the in the name of legal security state interventions. The state's equation that law is equal is subject to the control of the judge himself; the benes law, we have been bound by the strict binding judge in turn is strictly bound to the law, so that the judge can not fall into arbitrariness. The law can and will be on the other hand, and the written laws mark this attitude visibly to each one first correctly, to the individual as far as possible express themselves; however, it does not have to exhaust itself in it freedom by guaranteeing the freedom of contract, Our right originates directly from the national freedom of testing and the freedom-free bestimmune socialism. For us, the political and world terms of ownership must be granted. The struggle, which is waged in the name of legal certainty, is in the same way legally binding as the in truth, therefore, no struggle, the law cast in the Name of the legal form; for it is governed by law, but it is a struggle for the law, conceived with the harmony between National Socialism and freedom and security of the ideally isolated law, that agreement between the legal person by law. This "legal certainty" exists in Germany, which once and for all, as I am presenting to you, is no longer at issue! We are no longer concerned with the attempts to remove the legal alienation of the people from their rights, which is historically conditioned, from the point of view of the protection of their rights as unbound as possible. It is also true that the exercise of the individual, who has the purpose of the right to do so, is the task of the judge to adapt him to the greatest extent possible against restrictions. It must not protect that of a decision-making body by the state. This security of a mate, which always only has the word unilateral right, is, of course, over. The individual legal provisions are not included and its law, according to National Socialist divisions, no longer contains abstract concepts of aigran. I would like to ask the President-in-Office whether he is prepared to accept the motion for a resolution tabled by the Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats. The one who, by looking from the individual and from the legal uncertainty, is open door and door; because you steer community, we want to break the judge with that old one, if you want him from the attachment to the concept of legal certainty. We mean with legal norm solved, to his only private security the justice in the sense that the dieter's legal consciousness refers. No, we do not want to trust this as a member of the community! Such misconceptions can only happen if it is justified in all circumstances; that the one who can have the feeling of the universal bindingness of the national and the individual as a people's comrade denies socialist worldview. We, as a valuable and respected member of the Community, do not relax the strict commitment of the judge to the law, to be protected in his work and in his honor, in order to become the purely private legal consciousness of the one; that an injustice which happens to him also happens to the single judge as the basis of the judicial community to which he belongs. We want to make a decision. We loosen them only because we know that the law restricts the judge in his position, thus does not make him unfree, only direct the work of the individual people, but never, on the contrary, can deprive him of his awareness of the value of what in the individual case increases the right of his personality. This is to be the aim of the judge from the fixed basic, cultural, popular and racial biological measures of the National Socialist world view: the decline of National Socialism. Only the right-wing people, race, soil, work, honour, loyalty, etc. have we imposed bonds. We resist. So the judge is bound to the National Socialist world view against the merciless activity of so-called ung and only in the second fundamental rights, contractual or legal rights, line to the law. So no unbinding. because we know that the individual is truly free only but real bond!