English Translation

39 -11 = can be given. ( see this case in the criminal ancestor Prof. Dr. Grium wggen foreign exchange brokers and Questionr Frotokolle. Gestapo I and II. In this investigation, the falseness of the csl. land registers, which had already been discovered by Dr. Anders in 1936, was also demonstrated, and thus the fact that the c sl. state was not legally owned by the Coburgers (So ooohe ). (See Prague Protocols of the Prague State Police Prague I and II Coburg. ) Finally, the most personal enrichment of Linistern and RUL officials was proved, before all Dr. Hodgas, which Dr. Bennesch had covered for years. These investigations were also made in the most lòyalst manner TegoLEODE S to all, also the Czech Mit= TM. NC tb members of the prescribed arbitration commission. Lin counter-evidence did not take place, to Wal Millingident Dr. Vozenilek of the Csl. Bodenamt ex=culpted himself, he as anant had to give the instructions Minister = President Dr. Hodgas ü-a- Folge Z, in order not to run NER himself danger. ( Vozenilek was always on a free footing and gave this destructive report about his Ant vcllig uninvolved; he first denied the double sale of the estate, then recognized his, sub= script, but could not explain it.) Thus the questioners Fratokolle of the secret state police do not form anything other than a complete confirmation of the feast=rob bostellungen of the. Go. State police Vienna from l9z8, which later attacked Prine Coburg as a right-hander. It - -s - is from no side, neither from the Geneimen Staatspolfzzei, nor from the national tseheehic functionaries, nor the Reichsprotector a fort of the complaint of these me by Dr. Another demand for investigative activity or the sdotef unreserved credibility of the investigations carried out by the German authorities in a system of German affairs, which has been complicated for more than eight years, to this day to the knowledge of Dr. The Court of Justice of the European Communities, the Court of First Instance and the Courtof Justice ofthe European Communities have held that, in the event of a failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 85(1) of the Treaty, the Commission has failed to fulfil the obligations laid down in Article 85(2) of the EC Treaty.