Germany'S MINISTRY FOR CHEATURES AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 1136, sig. 110-11/74

Page 107

English Translation

62 -3- Lef m d.i. l8.7. 42 - once again in the sense of my remarks to the terde&Geh. State police wrote. She sent me a copy e of her letter of that day. 8 .)On 2l July 1942, following the suggestion of the Dresdener Bank, I immediately replied to the walk. State police and 8B8b asked for approval of the payment order, again under LeMeey Addition of a copy of Hugo Israel Sach's clearance decision of 8.IV.1942. m I 9.) By letter of 10. August l942 the Dresdener Bank told me that it no longer sees itself as an opportunity to deal with the matter. l0.) In the meantime I had a personal discussion with the Mr. Sachbearbeiter of the Go. State Police in Munich. I was informed that the decision of this case was taken in Prague. I already allowed myself to point out at this meeting that it seems to me then due, that my request was still held back in Munich, without forwarding it to the competent office in Prague. I pointed out at that time that my application already dated 17 March 1942, so in the meantime already 5 months passed. ral ll.) On December 4th, 1942, I immediately turned to the State Police in Prague, representing the expert opinion, and pointed out that the State police in Munich had informed that the state police in Prague were in charge. .vadI have also asked this post to assign my cost credit, with reference to the time that has elapsed so far. I did not receive an answer. I have momented at ll.I. l943 at the go. State police in Prague for payment, I did no answer. Since I found this behaviour of the competent authorities to be degrading to a German lawyer, I turned to the Reich Ministry of Economic Affairs on l9.II. l943 but mistakenly and described the facts to it.