NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44 Page 94 · 94 of 307
THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44
English Translation
On 5 April 1944, he admitted that he had received a total of 24.000 RM from H a n i s c h, which he had given to the administration. This statement was taken back by Major J u r k on 6.4.1944 and, since the 24,000,- RM were not booked, brought the police secretary N e u m a n and the Oberwachtmeister H e 1 m r e h in the strongest suspicion to have made money undercuts. It had to be considered suspicious because it had been established between that H a n i s c h over 33 O00.- RM H e 1 m r e c h had been given to Major J u r k for transmission and that Major J ur k wanted to have received only 24 O00 RM. It was only after in-depth verifications which brought about the guiltlessness of the N e n and H e l m r e c h and after the presentation of a bank account statement of the bank account Ilsenau that Major J u r k stated that he had received a total of over 43 O00 RM from H a n s c h, which had not been booked. He, Major J u r k, wanted to divert all this amount in order to have it available for a new deployment of the mission staff. He also explained the long holding of this amount, which was paid to the special account, Ilsenau only in March 1984, although it was largely handed over to Major J & r k at the beginning of January 1984. While Major J u r k recorded on 6 April 1994 that lo Ooo.- RM had been temporarily removed to create certain goods for the head of the Association of German Police Officers, on 7 April 1994 he made a completely new statement that Lieutenant G r e i w e had received from the Hanisch funds the still missing lo OO0.- rm informally for the payment of construction expenses for the conversion of the country headquarters of the General Superior D a l u e g e. This claim was maintained by Major J u r k even when it could be proved to him perfectly that in the Ilsenau account there were still about 24 O00. - RM of the General Superior D a 1 ueg e before him' and the use of the Hanisch money did not at all appear to be founded. On the question of where the remaining top of RM 1 647.25 would have remained, Major J u r k stated on several occasions that he had borrowed it from some of his acquaintances. Since in the meantime the 3 o00.- RM had been found in his desk, he stated that he had received this amount from the wife of the fallen 4 Obergruppenführer W e i t z e l for the payment of a bookcase she ordered. When it could be held that Frau:W e i t z e 1 did not give such an amount, he accepted this statement and stated that the 3 O0o.- RM were Hanisch money and money from his comradeship fund. He also had to take this statement back after he could be reckoned that proper camaraderie money could not be available. On the same day, Major J u r k was given the assurance that he had also diverted funds from a fork shop with H a n i s c h, which was also admitted by him. This opportunity to describe the statements of Major J ur k was necessary in order to show how uncertain he is in his statements. It seems little credible that he does not want to know what he has done with such a high amount. Therefore, the use of the diverted funds, as shown above, cannot be regarded as actual and irrevocable.