NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44 Page 26 · 26 of 307
THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44
English Translation
- 2 - if he could only allow an inspection into the same when presenting an explicit written approval of Mr. Gen.Oberst Daluege. - In these circumstances I reported on l4.l944 that the execution of the order given by Mr. Minister of State would be made impossible for me. I received a new order signed by the Minister of State that the deadline for submitting the statement should be extended until 2 February 1944 and that the supporting documents should be presented under all circumstances of Major Jurk. Since the books and partly the supporting evidence were in the apartment of Mr. Gen. Oberst Daluege in Berlin, there was there in the time of the 4th century. - 8.2.1944 of 2 representatives of the General Office of the Supreme Audit Office and 2 agents of the Missionary Staff II in the presence of Major Jurk worked on the completion of the settlement. At a reception at Gen.Oberst Daluege on 4.2.1944, he explained that he quite approves the preparation of a statement, as he thus obtains an overview of the activities and accounting of the mission staff. However, he could not allow control of the funds, since they were members of the Führer as freely available disposi- tion fund. The representatives of my General Council took note of the remarks made by Mr. Oberst Daluege and expressly declared that they did not carry out a review, but merely to participate in the settlement of the statement in accordance with the mandate of the Minister of State of 6.1.1944. In my report of lo.2.l944, in accordance with the mandate given, any activity which could have resulted from the pressure of an examination or a check was avoided. If Gen.Oberst Daluege claims that the final report does not contain any accusations against Major Jurk and his staff in financial terms, it should be noted that this first report immediately pointed out that the statement on 5.12.1943 did not give a precise overview of the accounts and assets of the Staff II. It was found that the 72012