THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44

Page 108

English Translation

The Commission's proposal for a directive on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the permissible sound power level of motor vehicles. As indicated by District Superintendent Master Ban bach and Guard Master Assman n, Major J u r k has ordered them not to include invoices which could be contested by the German State Ministry because non-bomb victims have been supplied as debits in the balance sheet, because then the names of the individual buyers would have to appear in the inventory, but rather to keep these invoices as stocks. A s s m a n n n , the amount of the compensation to about 40 OOO0.- RM. A survey of these invoices has not yet been carried out. In order to obtain an approximate picture of the Ümfauge, all delivery notes issued with the buyer's rams would still be the total amount of the anonym sales to be taken at the amount of 40 O00.- Ri. However, it is certainly not yet possible to say that all buyers are michtbomb-damaged. Major J u r k is still decrepit, zvei to him well-known ladies in his PKw. to have invited him to a short ride, which he describes as a private trip, and to be with them about 1 km. The two witnesses could not be heard. With these two acquaintances, Major J ur k visited the Üpo-leger of the Einsatzsta bes Il on a Saturday afternoon to show them the camp. In the laying the two Hajor J a r k would have asked to buy a fur each. Major J u r k wants to have approved this, whereupon both have taken one fur without payment. Major Y u rk did not indicate the removal of these two furs from the guard in the camp and also did not allow the removal to be booked in accordance with the provisions. According to him, he could not make the payment any more, that he went to Berlin the next day and was immediately arrested after returning from Berlin. As noted, the camp inspection took place on 25.3.1944. By virtue of the facts laid down in the above, Major J u r k is likely to have guilty himself of the following criminal offences: 1.) scheereramtsbeschreibung pursuant to § 350, & 351 StGB., namely by the strike of the RM 1 647,25, 2.) of the Ünbetreue according to § 266 StGB, by a) diversion of RM 31 900, which were staff funds, (a surrender of goods and objects of the Einsatzstab II to non bombenschädigte, 3.) the abusive use of the service vehicle to a private extent. (a) it must be mentioned that the special account ‘llsenau', for which Major J u r k is entitled alone, cannot be a Ronto des Binsetstabes ll, only because there are 25 O00.- Ru des Generals oberst D a l u e g e and ió O00 .- Rv of General W n n e n - b e r g in this account. In addition, the movements of the special account "llsenau" are not shown in the bookkeeping of the Einsatz Staff II. To 2.) b): The items and objects of the Mission Staff II are xxxekiiz mainly intended for non-bomb victims. So Major J u r k had to consider primarily the interests of the bomb victims with regard to the management of the objects entrusted to him. If he uses these things to arrange things for personal acquaintances and friends, he thereby damages the interests of the bomb-damaged population. Since he himself has ordered things, he too is in the benefit of advantage.