NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44 Page 102 · 102 of 307
THE GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 971, sig. 110-8/44
English Translation
68 s c h e n b a c h spoke through the facts and now explain the following: Major Jurk: I am not aware that I gave Row. B a n s c e n- b a b h the order, for unpaid invoices on the occasion of the preparation of the balance sheet part of the amount of about 60 O00.-RM not among debitors. Banschenbach: When A s s m a n n and I came to the conclusion of the balance sheet on certain invoices, in which I thought about the type of booking, I went with these invoices alone to Major Jop Oeo deum Cer put L invoices to express my concerns, if these bills had to be sent to DTRe Deutsche Staatsministerium eines lages. I asked deshaib for instructions on how these invoices, which could possibly be charged, could be recorded. Mr. Major J n r k explained to me that we should leave out these bills, which I then discussed, what with them, they hung up in the air. After a few discussions, Mr. major J u r k gave me the instructions to take these bills into stock, i.e. As a result, I have then selected the invoices that might be able to trigger and I have given the instructions to keep these invoices as stock. I have just been reminded once again of the consequences of a false statement. I am told that I can be punished if I make a wrong statement. If I had the opportunity to take an oath, I could take it with a calm conscience. I would like to bear in mind that I myself had no reason not to take these accounts properly into account. Personally, I did not care who bought things from the Einsatzstelle II. I have also had no influence on the sales and therefore had nothing to say. Note: Mr Major J u r k has been accused of why Row. B a n s c h e n b a h would have come to him with the invoices at all if he had had no interest in a special accounting of the bills. Row. B a n s c h e n b a c h replied that Mr Major J u r k had previously stated several times that there were several invoices among the invoices which could trigger the instigation. Mr Major Y u rk, on questioning, stated that, despite the statement made by ROW. B a s c e n s b a s h, he still insists on his point of view. RoW. B a n s c h e n b a c h also remains on his statement.For my statement: For my statement : erz.Jurk gez.Banschenbach Beglaub SMCZS Puiffe Krim:-Obersekr. Bür.Ang. O