STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 276, sig. 109-4/18

Page 52

English Translation

hs -3 - Contrary to the rule of the Reichskommissar, the general obligation to finance the procedure is laid down. JAnother difference is that 7 the costs of the other expenses (party house, bell tower, HJ and BDM home and other Community entities) are to be borne by the Reich's commissioner. I note that the extension of the powers of the Court of Auditors of the German Reich, as far as control over the funds flowing from other sources is concerned, is of concern. At least such a provision can only be met with the consent of the Reichskommissar) and the German settlement company. In the light of the re-evaluation (in the broadest sense of the word) to which, in my opinion, the Land Office is also obliged, I consider it to be ineligible, in accordance with the para graph ll a.o., for the settlement utilization values determined. Income values are not sufficient to cover the otherwise secured debts as well as the outstanding public-law charges and fees and the payment of a bridging grant by the Reichskommissar is considered necessary, so this regulation means that Reichsmittel to the pinanzierung of the protectorate budget is paid 1A). As far as the estimation commission mentioned in the same paragraph is concerned, the Reichsprotektor is granted a decisive influence on the amount of the costs of the settlement, without the Reich Commissioner and the settlement society having the opportunity to influence the activities of the Commission. Neither the Reich Commis- sioner nor the 1) Society are represented in the commission. It is interesting - again in the same number - to note that the Reichsprotektor has two for Jewish property, as well as for enemy property and anti-state property.