STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 128, sig. 109-2/29

Page 15

English Translation

It is also possible to propose the creation of a special status for the police, and this would also have the effect of providing special budgetary treatment. In its proposal, one could then refer to the creation in the Directory of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. In the case of the special circumstances in which the police were particularly present, Minßat Dr. Delbrück (Rfa) explained the document of 19 April 19942 in that he, at the request of the Reichsguardor and others, provided that he and his colleagues were not in a position to take part in the proceedings before the Court of First Instance. the summary of all posts in the sections of the Reich budget, often scattered in different chapters, of the posts assigned to the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, in a chapter 1 P, and the provision of a single forum for the implementation of these posts. MinRat Rheins (Reichsführer-v, Orpo) welcomed the proposal of the Minsat Kallenbach (RyM) that substantial simplifications would be achieved and that all difficulties would be removed if a clear line were to be maintained as in the General Government. It was also true that all the personal and actual expenditure - the general budget figures - was estimated by the police departments in the Protectorate, including the BdO and BdS, in the police's house aid, after the previous increase, which had already been the opinion of the police. The deployment of the two posts for the commander of the police and the commander in charge of the security police, as well as for the heads of the Office of Echt and Administration at the BdO and BdS in the budget of the Reichsprotector did not correspond to the wishes of the Police. This view was confirmed by MinRat Dr.Siegert (Reichsf., Sipo). For this purpose, Minßat Kallenbach (gFm) klerò stated that the previous regulation was not at the instigation of the RFl, but was repeatedly called upon to do so. Arndts (Reichsprot., Budget Group) did not think of the proposal of the Minsat Kallenbach (BFM) as a matter of principle, but he pointed out that, because of its fundamental and also political importance, the scope of the implementation of the posts of the BdO and BdS could not be decided in the context of this discussion. MinRat Dr.Siegert (Rei.