STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 128, sig. 109-2/29 Page 12 · 12 of 87
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 128, sig. 109-2/29
English Translation
MinRat Bheins (Reichsf.-, Orp) agreed to consider appropriate organisational changes and to consider how the circle of ministerial grant recipients at the Bdo in Prague could be limited. The necessary investigations and findings should be carried out by the BDo in Prague, which was confirmed by the representatives of the BdO present. Amendments to ororations or decrees are to be sent to the RdF before publication. Some cases still raised the question of the budget estimates of the ministerial allowance. RegR. Arndts (Reichsprot., Budget Group) argued that the ministerial supplement in the budget of the police, where the remuneration of the persons concerned, was to be paid by the Ministry of Finance. In the case of the Federal Republic of Germany, the Court of Justice of the European Communities held that, in the event of a failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty, the Commission had failed to fulfil the obligations laid down in Article 85(3) of the Treaty. MinRat Kallenbach (RFM) initially had concerns about the estimate of the ministerial allowance in the police's budget and was inclined to a regulation as it was taken by the Reichskommissar for/the occupied Norwegian territories, i.e. remuneration in the budget of the police and the ministerial supplement in the budgets of the Reich's protector. The proposal by the MinRat Dr. Peucker (RH.d.D.R.) to set up the posts of ministerial grant recipients in the budget of the Reichsprotector was not found to be appropriate because it called into question the solution found under point (a) which was considered to be correct and appropriate. In the light of all the circumstances, it was envisaged that the most appropriate and simplest solution would be to postpone the ministerial allowance in the police budget in Section V of Cape La. O18 In summary, the discussion revealed the following: On points (a) and (b): The personal and actual administrative expenses, as well as the necessary single expenditures of the police departments in the Protectorate, including Bd0 and BdS, are to be charged in the police's budget in Section V from 1 April 1942. The posts of the two commanders of the police and the security police, as well as the two posts of heads of the Office of Law and Administration at the BdO and BdS, will initially remain in the budget of the Reichsprotector until: