STÁTNÍ TAJEMNÍK U ŘÍŠSKÉHO PROTEKTORA V ČECHÁCH A NA MORAVĚ, PRAHA, inv. 356, sig. 109-4/101 Page 11 · 11 of 22
STATE SECRETARY FOR THE RUSSIAN PROTECTOR IN THINGS AND IN MORAVA, PRAGUE, inv. 356, sig. 109-4/101
English Translation
3 - Relationship between the Sudetenland and the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia on the one hand and the Old Kingdom on the other hand to maintain the administrative procedure of the enforcement judgment (§ 722 ZP0.), rather it would be advisable to apply the procedure according to the former German-Austrian legal protection - and legal assistance contract (§ 7, paragraph 4), which has proved itself to be effective. The right of opposition of the Reichsprotektor . according to Art.5 para.5 of the Führerererresentation of March 1, 1939 remains unaffected even for older debt instruments. The VO. does not settle the question of the recognition of primal documents in matrimonial matters. This question is reserved for a specific regulation. Furthermore, the VO mainly deals with technical questions. It will therefore suffice if only the following individual questions are dealt with briefly: The mutual enforcement of debt instruments within the meaning of an execution order in the scope of another execution order should not cause any significant difficulties (§ 4). In the case of the enforcement of debt instruments within the meaning of a rule of law within the scope of the Reichs-Zpo, however, special provisions may be laid down because the court does not necessarily refer to enforcement; rather, enforcement is carried out to an essential extent by bailiffs acting on the direct mandate of the parties. In the case of bailiffs, knowledge of the regulations of the execution regulations and knowledge of different types of debt instruments cannot be required to the extent of the courts. As a result, § 2 provides that the execution of debt securities within the meaning of an execution order within the scope of the Reichs-Zpo. The enforcement clause shall be issued by the court in the jurisdiction in which the debt instrument is established, since the court is most likely to assess the conditions for the grant of enforceable exportation.