NĚMECKÉ STÁTNÍ MINISTERSTVO PRO ČECHY A MORAVU, PRAHA (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 715, sig. 110-5/4 (poškozeno) Page 81 · 81 of 88
GERMAN STATE MINISTRY FOR CHECH AND MORAV, PRAGUE (1906) 1939 - 1945 (1965), inv. 715, sig. 110-5/4 (damaged)
English Translation
- 2 - 66 for giving her husband the opportunity to justify, since he as honorary bearer and old SA-man finally has a claim to it. I recalled to her that the present material was well documented, there could be no talk of denunciations at all. In addition, her husband has the possibility to provide his information in the context of the SA's investigation procedure. According to the documents available to me, I considered it impossible for the expulsion order to be lifted again. As a result, I told Mrs B. that I had expected her to leave the Protectorate with her husband. Her objection, since she had not been asked to do so, was true, but when she was expelled, she was not thought that she would still stay here. I had to inform her today that her further stay in the Protectorates was also undesirable. I would suggest that she also move her residence to a place outside the Protectorate. Ms. B. then explained that she had been ill for a long time and was not able to move. She even immediately tried to obtain an exit permit to Italy, as she had received urgent medical advice from a doctor in Italy. She has had a high fever for months, and indeed she has the Bang's disease. She will visit Dr. Kindermann from the City Health Office in the next few days to have a medical certificate issued. Furthermore, it should be noted that she bought a chemical company in Prague for 1.5 million crowns with the permission of the competent authorities on 1.9.1942. She is also a member of the board of directors of Vobrosil u. Baier in Prague. She has no possibility to stay anywhere else at the moment, since her husband does not own an apartment in Böhm.-Leipa, but lives in the factory. The house of her parents-in-law had been so badly damaged during a bomb attack that she could not go there either, on the contrary, she had the intention of having her parents - in-law come to Prague. I immediately replied that I thought a trip to Prague by her parents‐in‐law was unbearable under the circumstances. Mrs B. also agreed to refrain from doing so for the time being. Ms. B. then asked further whether she had to solve the business connections of her brother-in-law Friedrich Becker, who was involved in the Barton company.