English Translation

- 3 - Reporting is not required, but care must always be taken to ensure that the individual problem is not the effect of a basic problem, a particular situation in a sub-area or context; if this is the case, continuous reporting is necessary. Example: Uncertainty about the interpretation of a concrete provision of law, e.g. because of unclear wording. This generally suffices a one-time notification. However, if after some time this ambiguity has not yet been resolved and result in new effects (e. g. uncertainty# in the case law) so:uss a repetition with new examples to follow. If, however, the ambiguity and uncertainty are an effect of an incorrect position of the judge on the law (the basic principles of the law and the related guidelines of the leadership are not observed), the individual case must be reported in the context of continuous reporting on this basic problem. 2.Example: A misjudgment is reported as a special report for transmission to the Reich Ministry of Justice according to here. If this is not a special case, but rather the individual appearance of a fundamental problem (e.g. the unacceptable effect of out standing posts in the jurisdiction), the process should be reported in this context in the context of the ongoing reporting on this basic problem. II.)Plannedness and uniformity in reporting. Reporting on all basic problems, partial problems and larger material contexts must be done according to plan, i.e., it must not only be reported on those questions where a good V-man happens to be present. No planless "desk analysis".